Through a combination of chance and circumstance, six individuals from different backrounds came to occupy berths 1 to 6 of a II Class compartment of a train that left Chennai Central for New Delhi. These berths, as you are aware, are usually inside a separate, closed cubicle and the occupants found themselves in constant company of each other, right through the 36-hour journey.
A was male, Tamil-speaking, Hindu, who belonged to the so-called forward community and was a non-vegetarian (to use that quaint Indian expression)
B was male, Kannada-speaking, Hindu, came from a backward community and was a vegetarian
C was male, Marathi-speaking, Hindu of forward community and was a vegetarian
D was female, Bengali-speaking Muslim (minority community) and a non-vegetarian
E was female, Hindi-speaking, Catholic (minority community) and a non-vegetarian
F was male, Hindi-speaking, Muslim (minority community) and a non-vegetarian
Back to the II class compartment. In such long-distance trains, once somebody lights a spark, conversation tends to flourish and can become quite animated at times. Heated arguments and fist blows are not uncommon.
When dinner was served at Sulurpet, B whispered to C, a fellow vegetarian, that he found the smell of non-veg food quite overpowering and wished that the Railways would serve only vegetarian food. Hearing which, A, D, E and F exchanged glances that clearly indicated that B and C should keep their abnormal preferences to themselves and not try to pass judgement on the dietary habits of the majority.
When it was time to sleep, D who had been allotted an upper berth requested F if she could take his lower berth, obviously appealing to the latter's sense of chivalry. F gave in reluctantly but commented that when women these days sought equality in all other fields, why did they seek special treatment when it came to queues, lower berths, etc? A, B and C nodded in approval. But E, the other female in the group, came to the support of D and rebuked C, A, B and F for lack of elementary consideration to a person who belonged to the same gender as their mothers and sisters.
When the train reached Kazipet, A who knew no Hindi or Telugu wanted to buy something from a vendor who knew no Tamil or English. This irked A who commented aloud that Hindi zealots were shoving Hindi down the throats of South Indians and wondered what had happened to Nehrus assurance in Parliament . B and D supported this view, but E and F felt that this was ridiculous and that anybody who called himself an Indian should be proud of the national language which was Hindi and must make an effort to understand and learn the language.
Near Nagpur, the conversation turned to the over-crowding of Mumbai. C, who was a Shiv Sena supporter, observed that the only practical solution was to ask all non-Marathi people who came in after 1990, to leave Mumbai. A, B, D, E and F pounced on him for his parochial views and reminded him that Mumbai belonged to the whole nation and was not the private property of the Shiv Sena party.
At Bhopal, while buying a bottle of mineral water, A accused B of belonging to a state that unreasonably withheld Tamilnadus rightful share of the Cauvery water. C intervened and asked both to hold fire, stating that the whole issue was overblown by the politicians and enlightened citizens shouldnt get carried away. D, E and F nodded approvingly. B, supported by A, then trained his gun on C and asked him to lay off, as the latter came from a state that was making a completely illegitimate demand on a territory (Belgaum) that had been an integral part of Karnataka for ages. D, E and F nodded approvingly, while C argued vehemently that Marathi being the dominant language in Belgaum, it was foolish to keep it in Karnataka.
At Gwalior, the discussions turned to the recent comments made by the Pope on Muslims and D and F expressed their displeasure to E. Butting in, A, B and C felt that both the Pope and the Muslims should apologise to each other and take a few lessons in tolerance from Hinduism. This drew derisive sniggers from D, E and F united in their faiths of Abrahamic origin.
At Agra, A was heard talking on his mobile phone to his son studying at Pilani. He kept down the phone and explained that because of the shameful policy of reservation in Tamilnadu, people belonging to the forward community were forced to admit their sons/daughters in institutions in far-off places. C was quite empathetic but B.D.E and F took umbrage at this statement and argued that unless affirmative action was taken, the minority would remain suppressed for ever.
So many different issues had been dissected during the journey. Each of them, A. B. C. D. E and F had taken up strong positions on each issue and found himself/herself forming part of or pitted against different groups comprising different individuals at different times, demonstrating yet again that India was a fascinating country which could be divided in so many different ways and its people classified into so many different types.
As the train neared Delhi, the TTE informed them that the train would be delayed by one more hour, due to a rail roko dharna, a few miles ahead.
A was male, Tamil-speaking, Hindu, who belonged to the so-called forward community and was a non-vegetarian (to use that quaint Indian expression)
B was male, Kannada-speaking, Hindu, came from a backward community and was a vegetarian
C was male, Marathi-speaking, Hindu of forward community and was a vegetarian
D was female, Bengali-speaking Muslim (minority community) and a non-vegetarian
E was female, Hindi-speaking, Catholic (minority community) and a non-vegetarian
F was male, Hindi-speaking, Muslim (minority community) and a non-vegetarian
Back to the II class compartment. In such long-distance trains, once somebody lights a spark, conversation tends to flourish and can become quite animated at times. Heated arguments and fist blows are not uncommon.
When dinner was served at Sulurpet, B whispered to C, a fellow vegetarian, that he found the smell of non-veg food quite overpowering and wished that the Railways would serve only vegetarian food. Hearing which, A, D, E and F exchanged glances that clearly indicated that B and C should keep their abnormal preferences to themselves and not try to pass judgement on the dietary habits of the majority.
When it was time to sleep, D who had been allotted an upper berth requested F if she could take his lower berth, obviously appealing to the latter's sense of chivalry. F gave in reluctantly but commented that when women these days sought equality in all other fields, why did they seek special treatment when it came to queues, lower berths, etc? A, B and C nodded in approval. But E, the other female in the group, came to the support of D and rebuked C, A, B and F for lack of elementary consideration to a person who belonged to the same gender as their mothers and sisters.
When the train reached Kazipet, A who knew no Hindi or Telugu wanted to buy something from a vendor who knew no Tamil or English. This irked A who commented aloud that Hindi zealots were shoving Hindi down the throats of South Indians and wondered what had happened to Nehrus assurance in Parliament . B and D supported this view, but E and F felt that this was ridiculous and that anybody who called himself an Indian should be proud of the national language which was Hindi and must make an effort to understand and learn the language.
Near Nagpur, the conversation turned to the over-crowding of Mumbai. C, who was a Shiv Sena supporter, observed that the only practical solution was to ask all non-Marathi people who came in after 1990, to leave Mumbai. A, B, D, E and F pounced on him for his parochial views and reminded him that Mumbai belonged to the whole nation and was not the private property of the Shiv Sena party.
At Bhopal, while buying a bottle of mineral water, A accused B of belonging to a state that unreasonably withheld Tamilnadus rightful share of the Cauvery water. C intervened and asked both to hold fire, stating that the whole issue was overblown by the politicians and enlightened citizens shouldnt get carried away. D, E and F nodded approvingly. B, supported by A, then trained his gun on C and asked him to lay off, as the latter came from a state that was making a completely illegitimate demand on a territory (Belgaum) that had been an integral part of Karnataka for ages. D, E and F nodded approvingly, while C argued vehemently that Marathi being the dominant language in Belgaum, it was foolish to keep it in Karnataka.
At Gwalior, the discussions turned to the recent comments made by the Pope on Muslims and D and F expressed their displeasure to E. Butting in, A, B and C felt that both the Pope and the Muslims should apologise to each other and take a few lessons in tolerance from Hinduism. This drew derisive sniggers from D, E and F united in their faiths of Abrahamic origin.
At Agra, A was heard talking on his mobile phone to his son studying at Pilani. He kept down the phone and explained that because of the shameful policy of reservation in Tamilnadu, people belonging to the forward community were forced to admit their sons/daughters in institutions in far-off places. C was quite empathetic but B.D.E and F took umbrage at this statement and argued that unless affirmative action was taken, the minority would remain suppressed for ever.
So many different issues had been dissected during the journey. Each of them, A. B. C. D. E and F had taken up strong positions on each issue and found himself/herself forming part of or pitted against different groups comprising different individuals at different times, demonstrating yet again that India was a fascinating country which could be divided in so many different ways and its people classified into so many different types.
As the train neared Delhi, the TTE informed them that the train would be delayed by one more hour, due to a rail roko dharna, a few miles ahead.
A. B, C, D, E and F were finally united and unanimous in their criticism of the Indian Railways, the Indian Govt and the Indian bureaucrats. Will things never change? they cried in unison.

VC, thanks .
Reply | | Report Abuse
: This one's a winner all the way. (Wonder how I missed it?) Great stuff!
My feelings exactly. [I was looking in Travel blogs for something light to read before I left work for home and am so glad that I found this one.]
VC
Reply | | Report Abuse
Keshav, thanks for the appreciation.
Reply | | Report Abuse
Hi Plus,
This one's a winner all the way. (Wonder how I missed it?) Great stuff! I loved the way you use the train as a metaphor for our country. We are all in it together. We are divided, we are opinionated, we argue endlessly, we keep shifting alleigance...all true, but we do pull together when the chips are down, or when we have a common enemy. And we do have a common destination...like the train.
This is a great place and I wouldn't trade it for any other in the world.
Swarajya:
I'd like to disagree too. Who gives a damn what the Japs or the Yanks think about us? We are like this only...
Cheers,
Keshav
Reply | | Report Abuse
Priya, thank you for the lyrical comments. Would " United in diversity" be a better title?
Swarajya, thanks, but I disagree. The arguments, the loud, uninhibited discussions on any subject, however controversial, the ability to switch from one topic to another, changing one's position all the time- this is what makes India special and Indians unique. I would not settle for anything else.
Reply | | Report Abuse
In India we practice unity in diversity.Unlike people in developed countries like USA , UK , France, Germany etc we have the habit of talking as if we are the most knowledgeable persons.The freedom has come after a long struggle , but we do not seem to deserve it.We must look most dignified in public places and conduct ourselves well so that others admire us for our descipline.Instead we create a very nasty situation by talking on objectionable and controversial topics . We seldom care for the peace of other passengers while travelling. We create nuisance for others by our loose talks.Can we not learn descipline from from Japanese or Chinese- our Asian brothers?
A novel way of presenting a true picture of Indians from inside a railway coach.
Reply | | Report Abuse
Sharmila Pn : What gave you the impression that I have cribbed?
Reply | | Report Abuse
if you have noticed, there is a fundamental unity, of course situation diversity is visible, and it has to be, if not we would be clones.
maybe instead of cribbing at our lack of unity you should thank one for the fact that we can individually togather live this life.
Reply | | Report Abuse
excellent ! , well showed and explained .
dats india , different people , variety , disagreements ,
but dey will all have a link 2 bind dem ,
each and every type hv deir reasons , believes ,
some reasonable , some unreasonable ,
somehow something has 2 make dem understand ,
dat at the interest of d whole nation , dier issues
r not bigger dan dat . nice , blog , except could hv
gven it a diff heading .
Reply | | Report Abuse
Hey, Bharateeya=Indian. I only meant that only an Indian or Bharateeya will know the finer nuances of Indian politics and Indianness. Like the Belgaum trouble, the water trouble, majority minority, veg and nonveg etc. If you are a foreigner, I congratulate you on knowing so much about India.
If it is true, then of course you don't need to know the details discussed. I'd thought that it was an 'inspired' narration.
Reply | | Report Abuse
- 1
- 2
Displaying 1 - 10 of 19 Blog Comments